User agent detail

Dalvik/1.6.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.3; SM-P600 Build/JSS15J)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Dalvik 1.6Android 4.3unknown SamsungGalaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition Wi-FiTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dalvik 1.6WebKit Android 4.3SamsungGalaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition Wi-FiTabletyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Dalvik 1.6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.3SamsungGalaxy Note 10.1 (2014)mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25215 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.3SamsungGALAXY Note 10.1" 2014 Edition WiFitabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.3closeAndroid 4.3SamsungSM-P600closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.3Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41225 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.3SamsungGalaxy Note 10.1 (2014)tabletyescloseclose0.06001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.3SamsungSM-P600Tabletyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:06 | by ThaDafinser