User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian/3; Series60/5.2 NokiaC7-00/012.004; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 BrowserNG/7.2.7.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-symbian.yaml
Nokia Browser 7.2.7Series60 5.2Webkit 525NokiaC7-00mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Browser 7.2WebKit SymbianOS NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.119 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS NokiaC7-00mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18311 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.2WebKit Symbian^3 NokiaC7-00smartphoneyes0.022 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 012.004;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.2.7closeSymbian^3 NokiaC7-00closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia Browser 7.2.7.3closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.1621 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser WebKit 525NokiaOS NokiaNokia C7-00closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.52732 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Browser 7.2.7Webkit 525Series60 5.2NokiaC7-00mobile:smartyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian ^3NokiaC7-00Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:05 | by ThaDafinser