User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/9.80 (J2ME/22.478; U; en) Presto/2.5.25 Version/10.54
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Opera Mini 9.80 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.54closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 9.80closeJVM OperaMini 1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18611 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 9.80Presto 0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 9.80close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 9.80close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 9.80close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06204 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 9.80Presto 2.5.25 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41925 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 9.80Presto 2.5.25 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.54closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari closeiOS OperaMini 1Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:04 | by ThaDafinser