User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.3; en-gb; KFASWI Build/KTU84M) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.37 like Chrome/34.0.1847.137 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 34.0.1847.137Android 4.4.3Blink AmazonFire HD 7tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.37Blink Android 4.4AmazonFire HD 7 (4th Gen)Tabletyesyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.37closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeAndroid 4.4.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.25015 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.4AmazonFire HD 7tabletyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeAndroid 4.4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.37closeAndroid 4.4.3AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.05103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.37WebKit 537.36Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47629 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.37Blink FireOS 4.5AmazonFire HD 7tabletyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 34closeAndroid 4.4AmazonKFASWITabletyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:04 | by ThaDafinser