User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (PlayStation Vita 3.30) AppleWebKit/537.73 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
Silk 3.2Android unknownunknown SonyPlaystation VitaConsoleyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.2WebKit Android SonyPlaystation VitaConsoleyes0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Browser 3.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
PS Vita browser 3.2closeLiveArea SonyPlayStation Vitamobile-browseryescloseclose0.18111 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.2Blink PlayStation Portable VitaSonyPlayStation Vitaconsoleyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront NX close SonyPlayStation Vitacloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06304 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk NetFront 537.73LiveArea 3.30SonyPlayStation Vitacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40925 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.73 3.30SonyPlaystation Vitagaming:portableyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
PlayStation Vita closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyPlayStation VitaOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:04 | by ThaDafinser