User agent detail

LG-350 MIDP-2.0/CLDC-1.1 Release/31.12.2010 Browser/Opera Sync/SyncClient1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Opera/9.80 (MTK; U; pt-BZ) Presto/2.5.28 Version/10.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LG350 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.10closeMRE LG350mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20112 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.10Presto MTK / Nucleus LG350smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.10close LG350closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08105 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.10Presto 2.5.28 LGLG350closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41425 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.5.28MRE LG350mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Link Sync 10.10close LGLG-X350Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:04 | by ThaDafinser