User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40/3.0FP1; SonyEricssonW300i/R4GB001; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/null
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonW300i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Symbian OS Series 40 Sony EricssonW300ifeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonW300icloseclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser Gecko 20100401Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W300icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40102 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress Gecko Series40 Sony EricssonW300imobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 1.8closeNokia Series 40 NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.086 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:03 | by ThaDafinser