User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.110 Safari/537.36 CoolNovo/2.0.9.20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
CoolNovo 2.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CoolNovo 2.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.110closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
CoolNovo 2.0.9.20closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose4.74427 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
CoolNovo 2.0WebKit Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.110closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.110closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.14701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
CoolNovo 2.0.9.20WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40702 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
CoolNovo 2.0.9Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.110closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 27.0.1453closeMac OS X 10.7.3Desktopcloseclose0.068 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:02 | by ThaDafinser