User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Android 1.6; Linux; Opera Mobi/ADR-1107051709; U; en) Presto/2.8.149 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Opera Mobile 11.10 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.10Presto 2.8Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 11.10closeAndroid 1.6OperaMobi for Androidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 11.10Presto Android 1.6smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.10closeAndroid 1.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 11.10closeAndroid 1.6closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 11.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.10Presto 2.8.149Android 1.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 11.10Presto 2.8.149Android 1.6mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile 11closeAndroid 1.6OperaMobi for AndroidFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.08 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:02 | by ThaDafinser