User agent detail

MOT-Canary/SJUG1361AA 08.02.27I/10.21.2005 MIB/BER2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 EGE/1.0 UP.Link/1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaCanary Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaCanaryMobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-Canary SJUG1361AAcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser close MotorolaCanarymobile-browseryescloseclose0.22 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaCanarysmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaCanarycloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB close closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser MotorolaCanarymobile:featureyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaCanaryFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:02 | by ThaDafinser