User agent detail

SoftBank/1.0/821SC/SCJ001/SN000000000000000 Flash/Flash-Lite/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/mobilephone_softbank.yaml
SoftBank Mobile 821SCSoftBank mobilephone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SoftBank 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Samsung821SCmobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Softbank821SCsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung821SCmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile 821SCcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Softbank821SCFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:01 | by ThaDafinser