User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.2; U; Edition Next; ru) Presto/2.11 Version/12.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Opera Next 12.50Windows 8Presto desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.50closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 12.50Presto Windows 8desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.50closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.50closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.13 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.50Presto 2.11Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 12.50Presto 2.11Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.079 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:01 | by ThaDafinser