User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-US; LAVA iRIS 504q Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.3.1.344 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LavaIris 504q Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U3 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.3.1.344closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.292 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3WebKit Android 4.2LavaIris 504qsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.1closeAndroid 4.2.2LavaIris 504qcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 504closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.257 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.1.344WebKit 534.31Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.498 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Webkit 534.31Android 4.2.2LavaIris 504Qmobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:01 | by ThaDafinser