User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1587.0 Safari/537.36 SUSE/30.0.1587.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Chrome Dev 30.0.1587.0SUSE Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.167 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1587.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 30.0.1587.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink SUSE 30.0desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1587.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1587closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 30.0.1587.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.118 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1587.0WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.423 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 30.0.1587.0Blink SUSE desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1587.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:01 | by ThaDafinser