User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.43 BIDUBrowser/2.x Safari/537.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Baidu Spark 2Windows XPWebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 26.0WebKit WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.127 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.43closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.43closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.212 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Baidu Spark 2WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.43closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.0.1410closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.43closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.43WebKit 537.31Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Browser 2Webkit 537.31Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.43closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:00 | by ThaDafinser