User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; en-US; htc touch cruise t4242) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.2.0.311 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCtouch cruise t4242 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close generic web browsermobile-browseryescloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2 HTCtouch cruisesmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0close HTCtouch cruise t4242closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.144 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.311 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.427 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Gecko Windows Mobile HTCTouch Cruisemobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:59 | by ThaDafinser