User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (COS 998;COS 998; COS 998 Build/12345) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-cos.yaml
Chrome 18COS Webkit 535.19desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166close desktop-browsercloseclose0.198 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit 0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025close closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166close closecloseclosecloseclose0.238 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19COS desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:57 | by ThaDafinser