User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (S60V5; U; Pt-br; Nokia5233-C6)/UC Browser8.2.0.132/50/444/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia5233-C6 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.083 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 Symbian OS Series 60 V5Nokia5233-C6smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser UCcloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeSymbian OS Nokia5233-C6closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.089 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.132 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5233-C6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Series60 5Nokia5228mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:56 | by ThaDafinser