User agent detail

Opera/9.60 (J2ME/MIDP;Opera Mini/4.2.13337/503; U; ru)Presto/2.2.0;SAMSUNG-GT-S3100/S3100XXIH4 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Untrusted/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S3100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.60Presto 2.0 Desktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 4.2.13337closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.221 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 4.2Presto SamsungGT-S3100smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 4.2.13337close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 4.2.13337close SamsungGT-S3100closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 4.2.13337close closecloseclosecloseclose0.134 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 4.2.13337Presto 2.2.0 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 4.2Presto 2.2.0 SamsungGT-S3100mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.60closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:56 | by ThaDafinser