User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; en-US; CONNECT 2G Build/HCL+ME+Tablet+CONNECT+2G) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.0.1.275 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HCLmeCONNECT 2G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.0U3 Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.0.1.275closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.285 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.0WebKit Android 4.0yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.0.1closeAndroid 4.0.4HCLmeCONNECT 2Gcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.096 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.0.1.275WebKit 534.31Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.0Webkit 534.31Android 4.0.4CONNECT 2Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.09801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:55 | by ThaDafinser