User agent detail

Instagram 5.0.2 Android (16/4.1.1; 320dpi; 1196x720; samsung; EK-GC100; gd1; smdk4x12; ar_AE)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungEK-GC100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Instagram App 5.0WebKit Android AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Instagram closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid Samsung; EK-GC100; gd1; smdk4x12; armobile-browseryescloseclose0.287 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android SamsungGALAXY Cameracamerayes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid SamsungEK-GC100closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android Samsung; EK-GC100; gd1; smdk4x12; armobile:smartyescloseclose0.09701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.058 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:55 | by ThaDafinser