User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Tizen 2.2; sdk) AppleWebKit/537.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/2.2 like Android 4.1; Mobile Safari/537.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Tizen 2.2Webkit 537.3emulator Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Samsung WebView 2.2WebKit Tizen 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 2.2closeAndroid 4.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.212 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Tizen 2.2yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 2.2closeAndroid 4.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1closeAndroid 4.1closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.091 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 2.2WebKit 537.3Android 4.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.3Tizen 2.2emulatorcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 2.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 2.2closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:55 | by ThaDafinser