User agent detail

HTC S620/5.2.968/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP2.0 Configuration/CLDC1.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; Smartphone)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCS620 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 6.0closeWindows GenericWindows Mobilemobile-browseryescloseclose0.217 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows CE HTCS620smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows CE HTCS620closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.107 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile HTCS620 Excaliburmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:55 | by ThaDafinser