User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0(Linux;U;Android2.3.5;Zh_cn;AMAZE S200;320*480;)AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML) Version/3.1.2/UCWEB7.8.0.95/139/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCAMAZE S200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.5GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeAndroid HTCAMAZE S200closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.267 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95WebKit 528.5Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8Webkit 528.5Android 2.3.5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:53 | by ThaDafinser