User agent detail

Opera/9.5 (Microsoft Windows; PPC; Opera Mobi; U; ja) S21HT
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-emobile.yaml
Opera Mobile 9.5Windows Mobile HTCS21HTmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Deviceyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile closeWindows HTCP3702mobile-browseryescloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.5Presto Windows desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.5closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 9.5closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.096 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.5 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.425 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.5 Windows Mobile HTCS21HTmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile close HTCP3702Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:53 | by ThaDafinser