User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.1) Gecko/20141127 PaleMoon/25.1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
PaleMoon 25.1Linux unknown25.0 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PaleMoon 25.1Gecko 25.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.064 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Pale Moon 25.1.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.216 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Pale Moon 25.1Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Pale Moon (Firefox Variant) 25.1.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Palemoon 25.1.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Pale Moon 25.1.0Gecko 20141127Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Pale Moon 25.1.0Gecko 25.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:52 | by ThaDafinser