User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; SGP521 Build/17.1.1.A.0.402) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2062.117 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 37.0Android 4.4unknown SonyXperia Tablet Z2 LTETabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.4SonyXperia Tablet Z2 LTETabletyesyes0.056 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.35 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.4SonyXperia Tablet Z2tabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 37.0.2062closeAndroid 4.4.2SonySGP521closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.117WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 37Blink Android 4.4.2SonyXperia Tablet Z2tabletyescloseclose0.05201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.4SonySGP521Tabletyesyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:52 | by ThaDafinser