User agent detail

W3C-checklink/4.0 [4.4] libwww-perl/5.803
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesW3C-checklinkBot/Crawler0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
W3C-checklink 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesW3C Link Checkerclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesW3C Link CheckerValidator0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesW3C-checklinkLinkChecker0.208 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Library for WWW in Perl 5.803 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.429 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesW3C Link Checkerclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:52 | by ThaDafinser