User agent detail

Groupon/2.6.2977 (Android 4.1.2; Samsung T03g / Samsung GT-N7100; O2 - de)[preload=false;locale=de_DE;clientidbase=android-samsung]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungT03g Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Groupon 2.6.2977closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungT03gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.289 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1O2Sensation XE Beats Z715esmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungT03gcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Note IIcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Groupon 2.6 Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Note IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.13101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.049 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:51 | by ThaDafinser