User agent detail

PhilipsX331 MAUI/10A1032MP_ASTRO_W1052 Release/31.12.2010 Browser/Opera Sync/SyncClient1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Opera/9.80 (MTK; U; xx) Presto/2.5.28 Version/10.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-mre.yaml
Opera Mobile 10.10MRE Presto 2.5.28PhilipsX331mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.10closeMRE PhilipsX331mobile-browseryescloseclose0.205 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.10Presto MTK / Nucleus PhilipsX331smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.10close PhilipsX331closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.177 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.10Presto 2.5.28 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.5.28MRE PhilipsX331mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
MAUI Browser close Philipsx331Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:51 | by ThaDafinser