User agent detail

MOT-RAZRV3xvM/85.97.CDP MIB/BER2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaRAZRV3xvM Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-RAZRV3xvM 85.97.CDPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser close MotorolaRAZRV3xvMmobile-browseryescloseclose0.218 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaRAZRV3xvMsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaRAZRV3xvMcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB close closecloseclosecloseclose0.111 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
DROID RAZRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser MotorolaRAZRV3xvMmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaRAZR V3xvFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:51 | by ThaDafinser