User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; en-US; PULID F7) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/10.4.1.565 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
UC Browser 10.4.1.565Android 2.3.6 PULIDF7smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.282 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.4 Android 2.3PULIDF7smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.4.1closeAndroid 2.3.6closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.107 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.4.1.565 Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.4Gecko Android 2.3.6PULIDF7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:50 | by ThaDafinser