User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0) compatible; kototoi-crawl@yl.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
kototoi-crawl Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.5Trident Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.5closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows 2000desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyeskototoi-crawlclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.153 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.533 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.5 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:49 | by ThaDafinser