User agent detail

Sogou Pic Spider/3.0(+http://www.sogou.com/docs/help/webmasters.htm
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesSogou Pic SpiderBot/Crawler0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Sogou closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.295 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesSogou SpiderSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesSogou Pic Spiderclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyessogou spiderCrawler0.56 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sogou "Search Dog" closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.64 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:49 | by ThaDafinser