User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WKC) AppleWebKit/534.52.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.2 Safari/534.52.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 5.1.2Windows 7Webkit 534.52.7desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.1WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.1.2closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.1WebKit Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1.2closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.1.2closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1.2closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.1.2WebKit 534.52.7Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 5.1.2Webkit 534.52.7Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.0.3closeen_US Desktopcloseclose0.107 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:48 | by ThaDafinser