User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.0 Maxthon/1.0.5.1 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Maxthon 1.0.5Fedora Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon 1.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Maxthon 1.0.5.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Maxthon 1.0WebKit Fedora desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Maxthon 1.0.5closeFedora closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maxthon 1.0.5.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.264 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Maxthon 1.0.5.1WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon 1.0.5Blink Fedora desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:48 | by ThaDafinser