User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; PMP7170B3G Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.169 Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PrestigioPMP7170B3G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.281 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.0PrestigioPMP7170B3Gtabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.0.4PrestigioPMP7170B3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.109 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169WebKit 537.22Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.0.4PrestigioMultipad 7.0 Prime 3Gtabletyescloseclose0.038 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.0PrestigioPMP7170B3GTabletyesyescloseclose0.057 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:47 | by ThaDafinser