User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20080703 Mandriva/2.0.0.18-1.1mdv2008.0 (2008.0) Firefox/2.0.0.18
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 2.0.0.18Mandriva 2008Gecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0.0.18closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 2.0.0.18closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.0Gecko Mandriva 2.0desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.0.0.18closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 2.0.0closeMandriva 2008.0closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.0.0.18closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.0.0.18Gecko 20080703Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 2.0.0.18Gecko 1.8.1Mandriva 2008desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0.0.18closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:47 | by ThaDafinser