User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; es-la; lg-gw550) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.5.0.185/84/352/UCWEB Mobile, LG-GW550 Obigo/WAP2.0 MIDP-2.0/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGgw550 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.092 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeJVM GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.5WebKit LGgw550smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.5.0close LGgw550closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo WAP2 Browser WAP2WebKit 530.13 LGLGgw550closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo WAP 2.0Webkit 530.13Windows Mobile LGGW550mobile:smartyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:47 | by ThaDafinser