User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U;Android4.1.1;de-de; LC0816C Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 4.1.1; de-de; Build/JRO03CSafari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
3QLC0816C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.262 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 3QLC0816Ctabletyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeAndroid 3QLC0816Ccloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.13QQoo! Q-Pad LC0816Ctabletyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit closeLinux Tabletyesyescloseclose0.075 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:47 | by ThaDafinser