User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121012 SeaMonkey/2.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 2.13Mac OS X 10.5Gecko 16.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SeaMonkey 2.13Gecko MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.13closeOS X 10.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.13Gecko Mac 10.5desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.13closeOS X 10.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.13closeMac OS X 10.5closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.13closeOS X 10.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.108 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.13Gecko 20121012Mac OS X 10.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.584 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.13Gecko 16.0Mac OS X 10.5desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:47 | by ThaDafinser