User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.202.0 Safari/532.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome Dev 4.0.202.0Mac OS X 10.5Webkit 532.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 4.0WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.21 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 4.0.202.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 4.0.202.0closeOS X 10.5.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 4.0WebKit Mac 10.5desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 4.0.202.0closeOS X 10.5.8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 4.0.202closeMac OS X 10.5.8closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 4.0.202.0closeOS X 10.5.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.093 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 4.0.202.0WebKit 532.0Mac OS X 10.5.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.439 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 4.0.202.0Webkit 532.0Mac OS X 10.5desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 4.0.202.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 4.1.249.1025closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:46 | by ThaDafinser