User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.4; Win64; x64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Firefox 36.0Win10 6.436.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 36.0Gecko 36.0Win10 6.4Windows DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 36.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 36.0closeWindows 6.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.52 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 36.0Gecko Windows 10desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 36.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 36.0closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 36.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.12 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 36.0Gecko 20100101Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 36.0Gecko 36.0Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 36.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 36.0closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:45 | by ThaDafinser