User agent detail

Mozilla/4.61 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.9-RC i386)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
FreeBSD 4.9 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Communicator 4.6.1closeFreeBSD 4.9desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
FreeBSD 4.9desktop0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.61closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeFreeBSD 4.9closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.61 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Communicator 4.6.1 FreeBSD 4.9desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:45 | by ThaDafinser