User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; GT-P6800 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/tablet/manufacturer-samsung.yaml
Chrome 18Android 4.0.4Webkit 535.19SamsungGalaxy Tab 7.7tabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.171 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.279 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0SamsungGT-P6800tabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungGT-P6800closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.4Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.422 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Tab 7.7tabletyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0SamsungGT-P6800Tabletyesyescloseclose0.061 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:45 | by ThaDafinser