User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) RockMelt/0.16.91.483 Chrome/16.0.912.77 Safari/535.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
RockMelt 0.16.91.483Windows 7WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
RockMelt 0.16WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
RockMelt 0.16.91.483closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
RockMelt 0.16WebKit Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
RockMelt 0.16.91closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
RockMelt 0.16.91.483closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.107 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
RockMelt 0.16.91.483WebKit 535.7Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.428 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
RockMelt 0.16Webkit 535.7Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:43 | by ThaDafinser