User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; ISW12HT Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.111 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome 42Android 4.0.3Blink 537.36HTCEVO 3D ISW12HTmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311.111closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCISW12HTmobile-browseryescloseclose0.297 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 4.0smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCEVO 3Dcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.123 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.111WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.0.3HTCEVO 3D ISW12HTmobile:smartyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.0HTCISW12HTSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:43 | by ThaDafinser