User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_4; zh-cn) AppleWebKit/533.17.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Safari 5.0MacOSX 10.6unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 5.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeOS X 10.6.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.6desktop0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X 10.6.4closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AppleMail 533.17.8closeMac OS X 10.6.4closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0.1closeOS X 10.6.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 533.17.8Mac OS X 10.6.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 533.17.8Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:42 | by ThaDafinser