User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; zh-cn; Lenovo p700 Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/4.2 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Lenovop700 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 4.2WebKit Android 4.0Lenovop700smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 4.2closeAndroid 4.0.3Lenovop700closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 4.2WebKit 533.1Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 4.2Webkit 533.1Android 4.0.3LenovoP700mobile:smartyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:41 | by ThaDafinser