User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 2.3.4; en-US; HTC_Sensation_XE_with_Beats_Audio) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.0.2.389 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
UC Browser 9.0.2.389Android 2.3.4 HTCSensation XE with Beats Audiosmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.0U2 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close HTCA510emobile-browseryescloseclose0.278 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.0 Android 2.3HTCSensation XE with Beats Audiosmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.0.2closeAndroid 2.3.4HTCSensation XE with Beats_Audiocloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.095 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.0.2.389 HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.0Gecko Android 2.3.4HTCSensation XEmobile:smartyescloseclose0.05501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:40 | by ThaDafinser